OpenAcura Request a demoDemo

Example uses

Fourteen things that go wrong.

And how each one looks in the record. These are the problems inspectors write up most often, taken from published inspection data for each sector. Each is shown the way it would look in OpenAcura, using a different form each time. Every scene plays when you reach it, and again every twenty seconds.

Built for 21 CFR Part 11 ISO 27001 aligned ALCOA+ data integrity Electronic signatures Tamper-evident audit trail
Form Gate · Pharmaceutical

Deviation · investigation

Lena cannot close the deviation until she has recorded why it happened.

A fill-weight check on line 2 comes in under the limit. The deviation record opens with the batch, the reading and Lena's name already on it.

When she goes to close it, the record refuses: the root cause is empty. She records it — a worn dosing piston, found on inspection — and the closure is allowed. An inspector reading this later sees the cause, not a blank.

Failure to investigate discrepancies (21 CFR 211.192) was among the three most-cited observations in FDA drug inspections in 2024. FDA Inspections, top 10 observations of 2024

DEV-2291Batch B-4471 · fill line 2MAJOR
DeviationFill weight below limit, 14 units · in-process check 09:41
Raised byL. Haddad · operator · at the line
Batch statusQuarantined pending investigation
Impact14 units rejected · no release affected
Root causeRequired before closure
Cannot close: root cause not recorded
Root causeDosing piston worn beyond tolerance · found on inspection · linked to CAPA-1201
Closed by L. Haddad · verified by J. Nash · 15:02
Form Diff · Pharmaceutical

Data integrity · audit trail

Tom changes a result. The record keeps both values, and the reason.

A titration result was typed in wrong. Tom corrects it. The old value stays visible with a line through it, the new value sits next to it, and he has to say why. The time comes from the server, not from Tom.

When he tries to date the correction back to Monday, the record refuses. The entry is dated when it was made.

Data integrity was the second most-cited FDA observation category in 2024, and MHRA reports that quality-system and documentation deficiencies together make up close to half of all GMP inspection findings. Pharmaceutical Online, MHRA deficiency data

AUD-31542LAB-0917 · assay result · changeREASON REQUIRED
FieldAssay result (%)
Value98.199.1
Changed byT. Brennanauthenticated session
ReasonTranscription error, verified against the instrument printout attached
WhenThu 14 Aug · 11:08:42server time
Entry date cannot be set to Mon 11 Aug. The change is recorded when it is made.
Both values are kept. Nothing is overwritten.
Form Timeline · Medical device

CAPA · effectiveness

Dele closed the CAPA in March. The system waits to see whether it worked.

A sealing tool kept wearing early. Dele's corrective action put it on the maintenance schedule and the CAPA was closed. Closing is one claim; proven effective is a different one.

Effectiveness checks are booked at thirty, sixty and ninety days. The sixty-day check fails: the tool wore again. The CAPA reopens on its own, and the record shows that it did.

CAPA procedures were the most-cited observation in FDA device inspections in fiscal 2025: 279 observations, 10.5% of all device citations, most often for failing to verify that the corrective action worked. Cloudtheapp, FDA enforcement trends Q1 2026

CAPA-0912Sealing tool wear · tray sealer 3REOPENED
Closed4 Mar
30-day check3 Apr · passed
60-day check3 May · wear found
90-daynot reached
Claim oneClosed · signed D. Okafor · 4 Mar
Claim twoProven effective · no · reopened 3 May
Reopening is itself a signed, counted event. Root cause goes back to SRCA-114.
Form Router · Medical device

Complaint · reportability

A customer rings about a cracked tray. Priya has to decide, and the decision is kept.

The call becomes an issue with its origin recorded as a customer complaint, tied to the device lot. Priya answers the questions the regulator will ask: was there harm, could there have been, is it reportable.

Her answers and her reasons are on the record with her name. If the same lot comes up again, the complaint is already linked to it.

Complaint handling was the second most-cited observation in FDA device inspections in fiscal 2025: 211 observations, 7.9% of the total. Cloudtheapp, FDA enforcement trends Q1 2026

ISS-1402Customer complaint · tray cracked on openingDECIDED
INCall logged by P. Raman · lot 24-0871 · 2 units affectedorigin: complaint
?Injury or harm to a patient or user?YesNo
?Could it have caused harm if it recurred?YesNo
?Reportable to the regulator?YesNo
Reason recorded: packaging damage in transit, sealed unit intact · investigation opened INV-0330signed P. Raman
Same lot, second complaint: it links to this one automatically.
Form Strip · Food & beverage

CCP · monitoring record

The two o'clock metal-detector check was signed at two o'clock. The six o'clock one was not done.

Line 4 checks the metal detector with test pieces every four hours. Each check is signed as it is done, at the line, and the time is the system's.

At 18:05 the check is late. The gap turns amber and an issue is raised with the shift lead's name on it, before anyone has noticed. The day's record shows exactly which check was missed and what was done about it.

Unsigned or incomplete CCP monitoring records are among the most common major findings in BRCGS Food Safety audits, alongside expired calibration certificates and allergen records that do not match the production schedule. Oxmaint, BRC audit readiness

CCP-03Metal detection · line 4 · Thu 14 Aug1 MISSED
06:00R. Ferreira
10:00R. Ferreira
14:00A. Nowak
18:00not done
22:00A. Nowak
02:00due
signed when donemissed · issue raisednext
ISS-1377 raised at 18:05 · owner shift lead · line held until the 18:40 check passed · signed A. Nowak
Form Checklist · Food & beverage

Allergen · changeover

Line 2 is going from a peanut product to a nut-free one. Nothing runs until the swab says so.

The changeover checklist is tied to the production schedule, so it appears because the schedule says peanut then nut-free. The clean-down steps are signed as they are done.

The swab reading comes from the meter, not from memory. Only when it is under the limit does QA's release step unlock, and the line starts with the release signature already on the record.

Allergen documentation that does not match the current production schedule is a recurring BRCGS finding; the most-cited clauses in the 2022 Compliance Report, covering more than 22,000 audits, were hygiene of premises and equipment (4.11.1) and equipment design (4.6.2). QIMA, top BRCGS non-conformities

CHG-0552Line 2 · peanut bar → oat bar · Thu 12:30RELEASED
Line cleared, packaging removed12:34 · K. Osei
Wet clean, hopper and conveyor12:58 · K. Osei
Visual inspection, no residue13:04 · M. Bright
ATP swab, hopper outlet38 RLU · limit 100 · from meter
Allergen labels changed and verified13:11 · M. Bright
QA release13:15 · J. Nash
Line locked: release not signedLine released for oat bar · signed J. Nash · 13:15SCHEDULE 2-0814
Form Trace · Logistics & distribution

Cold chain · GDP

The trailer sat in traffic on the M6 and warmed to 9.4 °C for forty minutes.

The logger's data lands when the trailer docks. The excursion is found by the system, not by someone reading a printout: forty minutes above eight degrees, 14:10 to 14:50.

That becomes an issue with the load held and the Responsible Person named. Her decision on the product, and her reasons, are recorded on the same record as the trace.

In MHRA's GDP deficiency data, transportation is the second largest category of major findings after the quality system, and those findings "mainly deal with temperature control and monitoring". ECA Academy, MHRA GDP deficiency data

LOG-8811Trailer 2281 · Leeds → Stafford · 9h 10mEXCURSION
8 °C2 °C 05:4010:1514:50 9.4 °C · 40 min
Issue
ISS-1341 raised from the logger data at 14:52 · load held at bay 2
RP decision
Product released after stability data review · reason recorded · signed H. Byrne 16:40
Form Handheld · Logistics & distribution

Inbound check · at the dock

Marco does the check where the trailer is, and that is where it is recorded.

The check runs on the handheld at bay 4: temperature, doors, seal, load. Each answer is stamped with the time it was given. The seal fails, so the load is held and the issue exists before Marco has walked back to the office.

His voice note is the description. Nobody types it up later, so nothing is lost or tidied in the retelling.

MHRA's GDP deficiency data puts documentation that does not match what actually happened among the most common findings, alongside temperature control and the Responsible Person's oversight. ECA Academy, MHRA GDP deficiency data

OpenAcura06:40
Inbound trailer check · bay 4Carrier C-118 · trailer 2281 · chilled
Temperature at door 2–8 °C3.9 °C
Doors and curtain intactPass
Seal matches manifestFail
0:14
Photo of seal and door1 attached
LoadHeld
Signed · 06:42 · bay 4M. Ferreira · ISS-1318 raised
Form Map · Industrial & engineering

Safety · recurrence

The guard on press 2 was bypassed in February. In August it happened again, at another site.

The first time, the fix was a toolbox talk and the issue was closed. The second time, on the same press model at a different site, the record links it to the first instead of logging it as new. That changes what is allowed: the same fix cannot be used twice, and a structured root-cause analysis is required.

The group safety lead sees both sites on one record. The question "has this happened before?" has an answer without anyone ringing round.

HSE's annual statistics consistently list contact with moving machinery among the leading causes of fatal injury in manufacturing, and being struck by objects and handling injuries among the most common non-fatal kinds. HSE statistics

ISS-1330Guard interlock bypassed · press 2RECURRENCE
DoncasterISS-0884 · 19 Feb · press 2
Boltonpress 2 · no events
WrexhamISS-1330 · 11 Aug · press 2
Corkpress 2 · no events
2Same problem, same press model, two sitesClosed with a toolbox talk in February. This time the record requires a structured root-cause analysis before it can close.
SRCA-131 opened · owner group safety lead · both sites attached
Form Calendar · Industrial & engineering

Calibration · currency

The torque wrench on line 3 would have gone out of calibration on the eleventh. It didn't.

Every instrument has a due date and the site's own warning window. Thirty days out, the wrench turns amber and an action is raised for the maintenance lead, with the date on it.

When the certificate comes back it is attached to the instrument, and work done with that wrench in the meantime can be traced to it. An auditor picking a torque reading from June finds a wrench that was in date.

Expired calibration certificates are among the most frequently cited non-conformities in BRCGS audits, and uncalibrated temperature-monitoring equipment is a recurring MHRA GDP finding. Oxmaint, BRC audit readiness

CalibrationLine 3 · next 90 days1 DUE SOON
InstrumentAugSepOctNov
Torque wrench TW-31
Pressure gauge PG-07
Balance BAL-2
Thermometer TH-114
Metal detector MD-4
ACT-2231 raised 12 Jul · owner maintenance lead · calibrated 4 Aug · certificate CAL-9931 attached
Form Matrix · Any sector

Competency · on the day

"Who was qualified to run the metal detector on the fourteenth?"

The matrix shows every person against every task, and each cell holds a date. Ask it about a day in the past and it shows the state on that day, not today's.

On 14 August two people were valid, one was expiring, and the agency worker was not on the matrix at all — which is itself the answer, and it is recorded rather than blank.

Training matrices that leave out temporary or agency staff are a recurring BRCGS finding, and inadequate training programmes (21 CFR 211.25) were among the ten most-cited FDA observations in 2024. FDA Inspections, top 10 observations of 2024

CompetencyLine 4 team · as at 14 Aug 2026AS AT 14 AUG
AS AT14 Aug 2026TASKMetal detector check
PersonMetal detector checkCCP recordAllergen changeoverForklift
R. FerreiraVALIDVALIDVALID
A. NowakVALIDVALIDEXPIRINGVALID
K. OseiEXPIRINGVALIDVALID
M. BrightNOT COMPETENTVALIDVALIDVALID
D. Farrow (agency)NOT ON MATRIX
Two valid, one expiring inside thirty days, one not competent, one not assessed. Each cell carries who assessed it and when.
Form Ladder · Any sector

Document control · version in force

The check on 12 August was done to version 3. Version 4 came in on the twentieth.

Procedures move through draft, review and approval, and every version is kept with its effective date. Work done against a procedure records which version was in force, so a later revision cannot quietly change what somebody was told to do.

When version 4 is approved, the people who need it are asked to read it and sign. Three have not yet. That list is visible while it still matters, not discovered by the auditor.

Documentation is cited in roughly 13% of all MHRA GMP deficiencies, and procedures not established or followed (21 CFR 211.100) was the most-cited FDA observation category in 2024. Pharmaceutical Online, MHRA deficiency data

SOP-091Inbound seal verificationV4 IN FORCE
v2Superseded 12 May 2026retained, read-only
v3In force 12 May – 19 Aug 2026approved J. NashINS-7731 · 12 Aug · done to this version
v4In force from 20 Aug 2026adds seal-transfer step · approved J. Nash
Read and understood · v4
M. Ferreirasigned 20 Aug
R. Deanesigned 20 Aug
A. Nowaksigned 21 Aug
K. Oseioutstanding
M. Brightoutstanding
D. Farrowoutstanding
Three outstanding, visible on the team lead's list. Nobody can be told "everyone was informed" without it being true.
Form Board · Any sector

Huddle · the whiteboard

The whiteboard is still there. The difference is that this one remembers.

Most huddles already happen in front of a board: yesterday's problems, today's numbers, who is in. What gets wiped at the end of the week is the evidence that any of it was dealt with.

The digital board holds the same five columns, filled from the records. When the team decides something in the room, the decision is recorded under the problem, with a name and a date, and it is still there when the auditor asks, months later, what happened about the seal.

Illustrative. The board layout follows the product's five huddle stages: purpose, people, performance, problems, progress.

Dock huddle · Wed · markerBAY 4 – SEAL?? C-118
Rob → carrier audit Fri
temp bay 2
racking labels
OEE 82 · scrap 1.4
2 off – cover?
T1 Shift HuddleDock team · Wed 07:00CLOSED · SIGNED
PurposeSafety moment · manual handling
People9 of 11cover agreed for 2
PerformanceOEE 82%Scrap 1.4%
ProblemsISS-1318 seal C-118→ ACT-2210 audit carrier · Rob · Friracking labels
ProgressACT-2194 verified
Decisions recorded under the problem, with a name and a date. Wiped off the whiteboard; kept on the record.
Form File · Any sector

Audit · the export

"Show me a seal failure and what you did about it."

The auditor asks for one example. Rob picks ISS-1318 and exports it. Everything anyone did about it comes out in one file, in the order it happened, with the names and the signatures.

The cover sheet says how many entries there are and when the file was produced. Nobody assembled it the night before, and nobody could have edited it.

Illustrative. The entries are the ones from the week shown in the Dock to Boardroom exhibit.

Export · ISS-1318Generated 09:14 · 14 Nov 2026COMPLETE
OPENACURAISS-1318Seal mismatch · bay 49 entries · 6 signaturesTue 12 Aug – Fri 15 AugRequested by: retailer auditProduced by: R. Deane
  1. Tue 06:42INS-7731 check failed · voice note · photo · signed M. Ferreira
  2. Tue 06:42ISS-1318 raised from the check · SOP-091 v3 · competency valid
  3. Tue 10:52Triaged Major · Quality · owner R. Deane · signed N. Kelly
  4. Wed 07:14Reviewed in T1 huddle · decision: create action · facilitator signed
  5. Wed 07:14ACT-2210 audit carrier C-118 · owner R. Deane
  6. Thu 14:09Action closed · carrier email · checklist v2 · signed R. Deane
  7. Thu 14:22Verified effective · signed J. Nash · AUD-31207
  8. Fri 09:00Linked to ISS-1290 and ISS-1302 · third in sixty days
  9. Fri 09:31COM-0142 audit carrier before renewal · owner S. Whelan
Added to, never edited. One file, produced in a minute.

What the fourteen have in common

Every one of these was recorded by the person it happened to, at the moment it happened.

The forms differ because the problems differ: a trace for a temperature, a matrix for people, a ladder for versions, a strip for a shift. The record underneath is the same in every case, and so is the answer when someone asks to see it.

GateBlocks a step until the record is complete
DiffShows what changed, by whom, and why
TimelineChecks that a fix held, over time
RouterRecords a decision and its reasons
StripA shift's checks against the clock
ChecklistSteps signed as they are done
TraceA reading over a journey
HandheldRecorded where the work is
MapThe same problem across sites
CalendarDue dates before they bite
MatrixPeople against tasks, on a date
LadderWhich version was in force
BoardThe huddle, kept
FileThe export the auditor takes away

Sources for the figures used above

  1. FDA Inspections, Top 10 FDA 483 observations of 2024 (drug and device observation categories, FY2024).
  2. Pharmaceutical Online, 2024 trends in FDA observations for sterile drug manufacturers (561 drug Form 483s in FY2024).
  3. Cloudtheapp, FDA enforcement trends Q1 2026 (device Form 483 citations by CFR section, FY2025: CAPA 279 / 10.5%, complaints 211 / 7.9%).
  4. Pharmaceutical Online, Top 10 most-cited MHRA GMP inspection deficiencies by annex/chapter (quality system and documentation share of findings).
  5. ECA Academy, MHRA GDP deficiency data (major deficiency categories: quality system, transportation, Responsible Person).
  6. QIMA, Top 5 BRCGS non-conformities (BRCGS 2022 Compliance Report, 22,000+ audits).
  7. Oxmaint, BRC audit readiness checklist (frequently cited BRCGS non-conformities).
  8. HSE, Health and safety statistics (kinds of workplace injury).

Names, records and readings on this page are illustrative. Figures are from the sources listed.

Next step

See it against your own process.

Half an hour, your scenarios, no slides. If it is not a fit, we will say so.